ScholarQuill logoScholarQuillUniversity Notes
My Semester
Explore Notes
Past Papers12 New
Video CoursesNew
Search
Settings
Study Tools
GPA/CGPA Calculator
Schedule & To-Do
Student Portal
Contact
Contact
ScholarQuill logo
My Semester
Explore Notes
Past Papers12 New
Video CoursesNew
Search
Settings
GPA/CGPA Calculator
Schedule & To-Do
Student Portal
Contact
ScholarQuill logoScholarQuillUniversity Notes
Study PortalGE-167Proof By Induction
Ctrl + K
Login
Explore
Search
Semester
Papers
CGPA
    GE-167

    Discrete Structures

    Progress0 / 67 done
    Topics67
    1Propositional and Predicate Logic
    2Logical Operators3Translations Between Symbolic Expressions and Formal English Expression4Logical Equivalences
    5Quantifiers6Nested Quantification7Equivalences in Predicate Logic8Translations Between Symbolic Forms and Formal English
    9Proof Methods and Strategies10Direct Proof11Proof by Contraposition12Proof by Induction13Proof by Implication14Existence Proof15Uniqueness Proofs16Trivial Proofs17Vacuous Proofs
    18Notations and Set Operations19Venn Diagrams20Countable and Uncountable Sets
    21Equivalence Relations and Partitions22Partial Orderings23Recurrence Relations51Reflexive, Symmetric, Transitive, and Antisymmetric52Equivalence Relations and Equivalence Classes53Partial Orders
    24Injective, Surjective, Bijective25Special Types of Functions26Function Composition27Inverse Functions28Recursive Functions29Compositions
    30Sequences and Series
    31Inclusion and Exclusion Principle32Pigeonhole Principle33Permutations and Combinations46Product Rule and Sum Rule47Principle of Inclusion-Exclusion48Binomial Coefficients49Pascal's Identity and Pascal’s Triangle50Binomial Theorem
    34Division Theorem35Modular Arithmetic36LCM and GCD37Euclidean and Extended Euclidean Method38Finding Solutions to Congruence
    39Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic40Characterizations of Primes41Mersenne Primes
    42Weak Induction43Strong Induction
    44Formulation of Recurrences45Closed Formulas
    54Terminologies55Elements of Graph Theory56Planar Graphs57Graph Coloring58Euler Graph59Hamiltonian Path60Rooted Trees61Graph Traversals62Handshaking Lemma and Corollary63Special Families of Graphs64Graph Isomorphism65Planarity in Graphs66Eulerian and Hamiltonian Graphs67Trees in Graph Theory
    11 min read
    Topic 12 of 67
    Topic Study Note Illustration
    12

    Proof by Induction

    Mathematical Induction is a powerful proof technique used to prove statements about natural numbers (or integers in general) that hold for all values greater than or equal...

    Proof by Induction

    Mathematical Induction is a powerful proof technique used to prove statements about natural numbers (or integers in general) that hold for all values greater than or equal to a certain base case. It is a form of mathematical reasoning that establishes the truth of an infinite number of cases with a finite number of steps.

    Proof by induction is especially useful for proving statements that are structured in a way that can be broken down into simpler cases, such as those involving sums, products, inequalities, and other recursively defined structures.


    Steps in Mathematical Induction

    The inductive proof is performed in two main steps:

    1. Base Case:

      • First, you prove that the statement is true for the smallest possible value, typically n=0n = 0n=0 or n=1n = 1n=1. This step is necessary because induction builds on the assumption that the statement holds for smaller cases.
    2. Inductive Step:

      • Next, you assume that the statement is true for some arbitrary integer n=kn = kn=k, known as the inductive hypothesis. Then, you use this assumption to prove that the statement is true for n=k+1n = k + 1n=k+1.

    If both steps are successfully proven, it implies that the statement holds for all natural numbers starting from the base case.


    Structure of a Proof by Induction

    1. Base Case

    Prove that the statement holds for the first value of nnn (e.g., n=1n = 1n=1 or n=0n = 0n=0).

    2. Inductive Hypothesis

    Assume that the statement is true for some integer n=kn = kn=k. This is your inductive hypothesis.

    3. Inductive Step

    Prove that if the statement holds for n=kn = kn=k, then it must also hold for n=k+1n = k + 1n=k+1. This is the critical step where the inductive hypothesis is used to establish the truth for the next case.

    4. Conclusion

    Since the statement is true for the base case, and assuming that it holds for an arbitrary kkk, you have shown it must also hold for k+1k + 1k+1. By the principle of induction, the statement is true for all n≥1n \geq 1n≥1.


    Example of Proof by Induction

    Example 1: Prove that the sum of the first nnn natural numbers is given by the formula:

    Sn=1+2+3+⋯+n=n(n+1)2S_n = 1 + 2 + 3 + \dots + n = \frac{n(n+1)}{2}Sn​=1+2+3+⋯+n=2n(n+1)​

    Step 1: Base Case

    • We need to prove that the formula is true for n=1n = 1n=1.
    S1=1S_1 = 1S1​=1

    The formula gives:

    1(1+1)2=1(2)2=1\frac{1(1+1)}{2} = \frac{1(2)}{2} = 121(1+1)​=21(2)​=1

    Since both sides are equal, the base case holds true.

    Step 2: Inductive Hypothesis

    • Assume that the formula is true for some arbitrary n=kn = kn=k. This means we assume that:
    Sk=1+2+3+⋯+k=k(k+1)2S_k = 1 + 2 + 3 + \dots + k = \frac{k(k+1)}{2}Sk​=1+2+3+⋯+k=2k(k+1)​

    is true.

    Step 3: Inductive Step

    • We need to prove that the formula holds for n=k+1n = k + 1n=k+1. That is, we need to prove:
    Sk+1=1+2+3+⋯+k+(k+1)=(k+1)(k+2)2S_{k+1} = 1 + 2 + 3 + \dots + k + (k+1) = \frac{(k+1)(k+2)}{2}Sk+1​=1+2+3+⋯+k+(k+1)=2(k+1)(k+2)​

    Starting with the sum Sk+1S_{k+1}Sk+1​, we have:

    Sk+1=Sk+(k+1)S_{k+1} = S_k + (k+1)Sk+1​=Sk​+(k+1)

    By the inductive hypothesis, we know that Sk=k(k+1)2S_k = \frac{k(k+1)}{2}Sk​=2k(k+1)​. So:

    Sk+1=k(k+1)2+(k+1)S_{k+1} = \frac{k(k+1)}{2} + (k+1)Sk+1​=2k(k+1)​+(k+1)

    Factor out (k+1)(k+1)(k+1):

    Sk+1=(k+1)(k2+1)S_{k+1} = (k+1) \left( \frac{k}{2} + 1 \right)Sk+1​=(k+1)(2k​+1)

    Simplify the expression inside the parentheses:

    Sk+1=(k+1)(k+22)S_{k+1} = (k+1) \left( \frac{k + 2}{2} \right)Sk+1​=(k+1)(2k+2​)

    Now, this simplifies to:

    Sk+1=(k+1)(k+2)2S_{k+1} = \frac{(k+1)(k+2)}{2}Sk+1​=2(k+1)(k+2)​

    Thus, the formula holds for n=k+1n = k + 1n=k+1.

    Step 4: Conclusion Since the base case holds true, and we have shown that if the formula holds for n=kn = kn=k, it must also hold for n=k+1n = k + 1n=k+1, we conclude that the formula is true for all n≥1n \geq 1n≥1 by the principle of mathematical induction.


    Example 2: Prove that 2n≥n22^n \geq n^22n≥n2 for all n≥5n \geq 5n≥5.

    Step 1: Base Case

    • Prove that the statement holds for n=5n = 5n=5.
    25=32and52=252^5 = 32 \quad \text{and} \quad 5^2 = 2525=32and52=25

    Since 32≥2532 \geq 2532≥25, the base case holds true.

    Step 2: Inductive Hypothesis

    • Assume that the statement is true for n=kn = kn=k, i.e., 2k≥k22^k \geq k^22k≥k2.

    Step 3: Inductive Step

    • We need to prove that 2k+1≥(k+1)22^{k+1} \geq (k+1)^22k+1≥(k+1)2. Start with the left-hand side:
    2k+1=2⋅2k2^{k+1} = 2 \cdot 2^k2k+1=2⋅2k

    Using the inductive hypothesis, we know that 2k≥k22^k \geq k^22k≥k2, so:

    2k+1≥2⋅k22^{k+1} \geq 2 \cdot k^22k+1≥2⋅k2

    Now, we need to show that 2⋅k2≥(k+1)22 \cdot k^2 \geq (k+1)^22⋅k2≥(k+1)2. Expanding both sides:

    2k2≥k2+2k+12k^2 \geq k^2 + 2k + 12k2≥k2+2k+1

    Simplifying:

    k2≥2k+1k^2 \geq 2k + 1k2≥2k+1

    For k≥5k \geq 5k≥5, the inequality k2≥2k+1k^2 \geq 2k + 1k2≥2k+1 holds, so the inductive step is true.

    Step 4: Conclusion Since the base case holds and we have shown that the statement holds for n=kn = kn=k implies it holds for n=k+1n = k + 1n=k+1, we conclude that 2n≥n22^n \geq n^22n≥n2 for all n≥5n \geq 5n≥5 by mathematical induction.


    Key Concepts in Mathematical Induction

    1. Base Case: The first step where you prove the statement for the initial value (usually n=1n = 1n=1 or n=0n = 0n=0).

    2. Inductive Hypothesis: The assumption that the statement holds for some arbitrary value n=kn = kn=k.

    3. Inductive Step: The critical part of the proof where you show that if the statement is true for n=kn = kn=k, then it must also be true for n=k+1n = k + 1n=k+1.

    4. Conclusion: By proving the base case and the inductive step, the principle of induction allows you to conclude that the statement is true for all integers greater than or equal to the base case.


    When to Use Induction

    Mathematical induction is particularly useful for:

    • Proving statements about sums, sequences, or series.
    • Establishing properties of recursively defined functions or algorithms.
    • Proving inequalities involving natural numbers.

    Conclusion

    Proof by induction is a crucial technique in mathematics that allows us to prove statements about an infinite number of cases by showing that a base case holds and that, if the statement holds for an arbitrary case, it must also hold for the next case. By systematically applying the base case and inductive step, we can prove statements about all natural numbers or integers in a given range.

    ← Previous topic 11
    Proof by Contraposition
    Next topic 13 →
    Proof by Implication

    Past Papers

    Open this section to view and download past papers

    Click on Show Past Papers to load available exam papers.

    Reading Progress
    0%
    11mremaining
    1.9kwords
    Intermediatelevel
    On This Page

    No headings found

    Study Toolkit

    Subject Portal

    Discrete Structures