ScholarQuill logoScholarQuillUniversity Notes
My Semester
Explore Notes
Past Papers12 New
Video CoursesNew
Search
Settings
Study Tools
GPA/CGPA Calculator
Schedule & To-Do
Student Portal
Contact
Contact
ScholarQuill logo
My Semester
Explore Notes
Past Papers12 New
Video CoursesNew
Search
Settings
GPA/CGPA Calculator
Schedule & To-Do
Student Portal
Contact
ScholarQuill logoScholarQuillUniversity Notes
Study PortalGE-167Proof By Implication
Ctrl + K
Login
Explore
Search
Semester
Papers
CGPA
    GE-167

    Discrete Structures

    Progress0 / 67 done
    Topics67
    1Propositional and Predicate Logic
    2Logical Operators3Translations Between Symbolic Expressions and Formal English Expression4Logical Equivalences
    5Quantifiers6Nested Quantification7Equivalences in Predicate Logic8Translations Between Symbolic Forms and Formal English
    9Proof Methods and Strategies10Direct Proof11Proof by Contraposition12Proof by Induction13Proof by Implication14Existence Proof15Uniqueness Proofs16Trivial Proofs17Vacuous Proofs
    18Notations and Set Operations19Venn Diagrams20Countable and Uncountable Sets
    21Equivalence Relations and Partitions22Partial Orderings23Recurrence Relations51Reflexive, Symmetric, Transitive, and Antisymmetric52Equivalence Relations and Equivalence Classes53Partial Orders
    24Injective, Surjective, Bijective25Special Types of Functions26Function Composition27Inverse Functions28Recursive Functions29Compositions
    30Sequences and Series
    31Inclusion and Exclusion Principle32Pigeonhole Principle33Permutations and Combinations46Product Rule and Sum Rule47Principle of Inclusion-Exclusion48Binomial Coefficients49Pascal's Identity and Pascal’s Triangle50Binomial Theorem
    34Division Theorem35Modular Arithmetic36LCM and GCD37Euclidean and Extended Euclidean Method38Finding Solutions to Congruence
    39Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic40Characterizations of Primes41Mersenne Primes
    42Weak Induction43Strong Induction
    44Formulation of Recurrences45Closed Formulas
    54Terminologies55Elements of Graph Theory56Planar Graphs57Graph Coloring58Euler Graph59Hamiltonian Path60Rooted Trees61Graph Traversals62Handshaking Lemma and Corollary63Special Families of Graphs64Graph Isomorphism65Planarity in Graphs66Eulerian and Hamiltonian Graphs67Trees in Graph Theory
    6 min read
    Topic 13 of 67
    Topic Study Note Illustration
    13

    Proof by Implication

    Proof by Implication (or Direct Proof of Implication ) is a method used to prove a logical implication of the form:

    Proof by Implication

    Proof by Implication (or Direct Proof of Implication) is a method used to prove a logical implication of the form:

    P  ⟹  QP \implies QP⟹Q

    where PPP and QQQ are statements, and the goal is to prove that if PPP is true, then QQQ must also be true.

    The structure of the implication P  ⟹  QP \implies QP⟹Q is:

    • PPP is called the hypothesis or antecedent.
    • QQQ is called the conclusion or consequent.

    Steps in a Proof by Implication

    1. Assume the Hypothesis is True:

      • Start by assuming that the hypothesis PPP is true. This is the foundation of a proof by implication because we are trying to show that if PPP holds, then QQQ must follow.
    2. Derive the Conclusion:

      • From the assumption that PPP is true, you logically deduce that QQQ must also be true. This is done through valid logical steps, such as using known theorems, definitions, or rules of inference.
    3. Conclude the Proof:

      • Once you've established that QQQ follows from the assumption of PPP, you can conclude that the implication P  ⟹  QP \implies QP⟹Q is true.

    Example of Proof by Implication

    Example 1: Prove that if nnn is an even integer, then n2n^2n2 is even.

    We need to prove that if nnn is even, n2n^2n2 is also even. The implication we are trying to prove is:

    If n is even, then n2 is even.\text{If } n \text{ is even, then } n^2 \text{ is even.}If n is even, then n2 is even.

    Step 1: Assume the Hypothesis is True

    • Assume nnn is even. By the definition of an even integer, this means that there exists an integer kkk such that:
    n=2kn = 2kn=2k

    Step 2: Derive the Conclusion

    • We need to prove that n2n^2n2 is even. Starting with the assumption n=2kn = 2kn=2k, we calculate n2n^2n2:
    n2=(2k)2=4k2n^2 = (2k)^2 = 4k^2n2=(2k)2=4k2
    • Notice that 4k24k^24k2 is clearly divisible by 2 (since 4k2=2⋅(2k2)4k^2 = 2 \cdot (2k^2)4k2=2⋅(2k2), and it is of the form 2m2m2m, where mmm is an integer). Therefore, n2n^2n2 is even.

    Step 3: Conclusion

    • Since we have shown that n2n^2n2 is even when nnn is even, we conclude that if nnn is even, then n2n^2n2 is even.

    Thus, the implication P  ⟹  QP \implies QP⟹Q is proven: If nnn is even, then n2n^2n2 is even.


    Example 2: Prove that if a number nnn is divisible by 4, then nnn is divisible by 2.

    We need to prove the following implication:

    If n is divisible by 4, then n is divisible by 2.\text{If } n \text{ is divisible by 4, then } n \text{ is divisible by 2.}If n is divisible by 4, then n is divisible by 2.

    Step 1: Assume the Hypothesis is True

    • Assume that nnn is divisible by 4. By the definition of divisibility, there exists an integer kkk such that:
    n=4kn = 4kn=4k

    Step 2: Derive the Conclusion

    • We need to prove that nnn is divisible by 2. Since n=4kn = 4kn=4k, we can rewrite nnn as:
    n=2(2k)n = 2(2k)n=2(2k)
    • This shows that nnn is of the form 2m2m2m, where m=2km = 2km=2k is an integer. Therefore, nnn is divisible by 2.

    Step 3: Conclusion

    • Since we have shown that nnn is divisible by 2 when nnn is divisible by 4, we conclude that if nnn is divisible by 4, then nnn is divisible by 2.

    Thus, the implication P  ⟹  QP \implies QP⟹Q is proven: If nnn is divisible by 4, then nnn is divisible by 2.


    Key Points to Remember in Proof by Implication

    1. Start with the assumption that the hypothesis is true: This is essential because in a proof of implication, you prove the conclusion by assuming that the hypothesis holds.

    2. Focus on deriving the conclusion: Use logical reasoning and known facts to show that the conclusion necessarily follows from the assumption.

    3. The structure of an implication: The structure of an implication is P  ⟹  QP \implies QP⟹Q, and you must prove that if PPP is true, then QQQ must also be true. If you successfully show this, the implication is true.

    4. No need to prove the converse: In a proof by implication, you are only proving that P  ⟹  QP \implies QP⟹Q holds; you do not need to prove the converse (that Q  ⟹  PQ \implies PQ⟹P) unless asked.


    Conclusion

    Proof by implication is a powerful technique used to establish the truth of statements of the form "If PPP, then QQQ." The proof involves assuming that PPP is true and showing that this assumption leads logically to QQQ. By proving this, you have proven the truth of the implication P  ⟹  QP \implies QP⟹Q. This method is commonly used in mathematics and logic when dealing with conditional statements.

    ← Previous topic 12
    Proof by Induction
    Next topic 14 →
    Existence Proof

    Past Papers

    Open this section to view and download past papers

    Click on Show Past Papers to load available exam papers.

    Reading Progress
    0%
    6mremaining
    1.1kwords
    Intermediatelevel
    On This Page

    No headings found

    Study Toolkit

    Subject Portal

    Discrete Structures